Thursday
Apr232009
Charles Handy On Heterarchies (or wirearchies, for that matter)
Thursday, April 23, 2009 at 12:49PM
.
Charles Handy has long been my primary inspiration for thinking about, writing about, and working with organizations, primarily because of his depth of knowledge and humanist AND practical orientation towards the organization as a social system. His 1993 book "Understanding Organizations" should be a handy bible for any and all who work with and / or want to better understand modern organizations. I've had a copy for a long. long time and still refer to it on a regular basis.
Here (below) is his take on the concept of heterarchies as articulated by Karen Stephenson in the People & Strategy magazine article linked to in the previous blog post (and by extrapolation, wirearchies).
Please pay attention to the careful choice(s) of his words. One of the key reasons I have been so inspired for so long by Handy is that he maintains a steady focus on higher purpose (definitively expressed in his book "The Hungry Spirit - Beyond Capitalism: A Quest For Purpose in the Modern World", published as "The Empty Raincoat" in the UK).
He notes that "technology without trust is just traffic". I agree. I sense that Handy may not have experienced some of the interactivity leading to a wide range of working and other relationships that blogging, twitter, and other participative media have spawned, wherein I (and I am sure many others) have observed and participated in the building and sustenance of trustful relationships. But, his point is still extremely pertinent, as those relationships have often not been tested over-much in terms of trust.
(I heard a comment last night at a F2F meetup re: social media, where Tris Hussey's fiancee, who does not use social media much if at all, said she felt much of the medium / social media was passive-aggressive. I understood immediately what she meant. Either people are taking shots at each other or spreading their (ersatz) sugar-plum fairy "whuffie" and nice but usually superficial thoughts and pointers all over the place with little if any sincerity).
However, as I and many others have noted time and again, these are still the very early days of a new set of conditions that will be with us for a long time forward. It behooves us to begin and continue the necessary adoption and adaptations, where and how it is pertinent to ours and others lives and livelihoods.
.
Charles Handy, London Business School and the Royal Society of Arts
.
Karen Stephenson has highlighted an increasingly important challenge to our organizations.
She has focused on the need for institutions of all types to work collaboratively, but through a virtual network of hidden connectors rather than some cumbersome structural arrangement. She is right but, sadly, labelling the problem does not solve it: It may even make it worse.
Organizations, and even groups of organizations, are very prone to the practice of “boxing the problem.” That is, having identified a continuing issue, they create a box somewhere on the organization chart, give it the name of the problem and put some people in it in the hope that they will deal with it.
Unfortunately, this only adds to the bureaucratic tangle that Karen Stephenson wants to avoid. My concern is this: Bringing the hidden connectors into the light by, for instance, labelling them as the heterarchy might result in them being herded into just another box, and told to sort it out – to end up as just another committee.
The answer must be to keep them hidden, but this requires, from those hidden connectors, a willingness to downplay their own significance to create something bigger together. They are only likely to do this if they feel that they can be a part, however unrecognized, of some greater cause.
This, then, is the new leadership challenge: to inspire people to want to reach beyond the bounds of their own organization to create something special, and to find the other connectors who will help them to do this.
This means that the leaders themselves need to have horizons beyond their own organizations, rather than concentrating on their purely local priorities – a quality that, I fear, is all too rare. However, Julia Middleton, of Common Purpose, in her recent book Beyond Authority has some nice examples of leaders who have done just that.
I am worried, too, by Karen Stephenson’s all-too-accurate comment that technology without trust is merely traffic. My worry, to use a modification of another of her neat observations, is that technology trumps trust: that just because we can communicate we believe we can collaborate.
After watching a violin quartet the other night, I asked one of the performers if they could play the same quartet virtually, if they were connected by some videoconferencing facility that linked them while being physically in different countries. She said that it might be technically possible but only if they had previously worked together and rehearsed in the same space. “The empathy and trust wouldn’t be there otherwise,” she said. Too true, I fear, and the same applies to any working group, be they playing violins or not.
The new heterarchies won’t work unless those hidden connectors can, in a sense, become the equivalent of that violin quartet, where leadership is so subtle as to be almost invisible; where empathy is the favored way of communicating; and where personal rivalry is subsumed in the cause of their joint creation. That won’t happen by e-mailing alone, just one more challenge thrown up by this new organizational form of heterarchy.
Karen Stephenson is right to have drawn our attention to it.
.
Charles Handy has long been my primary inspiration for thinking about, writing about, and working with organizations, primarily because of his depth of knowledge and humanist AND practical orientation towards the organization as a social system. His 1993 book "Understanding Organizations" should be a handy bible for any and all who work with and / or want to better understand modern organizations. I've had a copy for a long. long time and still refer to it on a regular basis.
Here (below) is his take on the concept of heterarchies as articulated by Karen Stephenson in the People & Strategy magazine article linked to in the previous blog post (and by extrapolation, wirearchies).
Please pay attention to the careful choice(s) of his words. One of the key reasons I have been so inspired for so long by Handy is that he maintains a steady focus on higher purpose (definitively expressed in his book "The Hungry Spirit - Beyond Capitalism: A Quest For Purpose in the Modern World", published as "The Empty Raincoat" in the UK).
He notes that "technology without trust is just traffic". I agree. I sense that Handy may not have experienced some of the interactivity leading to a wide range of working and other relationships that blogging, twitter, and other participative media have spawned, wherein I (and I am sure many others) have observed and participated in the building and sustenance of trustful relationships. But, his point is still extremely pertinent, as those relationships have often not been tested over-much in terms of trust.
(I heard a comment last night at a F2F meetup re: social media, where Tris Hussey's fiancee, who does not use social media much if at all, said she felt much of the medium / social media was passive-aggressive. I understood immediately what she meant. Either people are taking shots at each other or spreading their (ersatz) sugar-plum fairy "whuffie" and nice but usually superficial thoughts and pointers all over the place with little if any sincerity).
However, as I and many others have noted time and again, these are still the very early days of a new set of conditions that will be with us for a long time forward. It behooves us to begin and continue the necessary adoption and adaptations, where and how it is pertinent to ours and others lives and livelihoods.
.
Of Hidden Connectors and a Violin Quartet
Charles Handy, London Business School and the Royal Society of Arts
.
Karen Stephenson has highlighted an increasingly important challenge to our organizations.
She has focused on the need for institutions of all types to work collaboratively, but through a virtual network of hidden connectors rather than some cumbersome structural arrangement. She is right but, sadly, labelling the problem does not solve it: It may even make it worse.
Organizations, and even groups of organizations, are very prone to the practice of “boxing the problem.” That is, having identified a continuing issue, they create a box somewhere on the organization chart, give it the name of the problem and put some people in it in the hope that they will deal with it.
Unfortunately, this only adds to the bureaucratic tangle that Karen Stephenson wants to avoid. My concern is this: Bringing the hidden connectors into the light by, for instance, labelling them as the heterarchy might result in them being herded into just another box, and told to sort it out – to end up as just another committee.
The answer must be to keep them hidden, but this requires, from those hidden connectors, a willingness to downplay their own significance to create something bigger together. They are only likely to do this if they feel that they can be a part, however unrecognized, of some greater cause.
This, then, is the new leadership challenge: to inspire people to want to reach beyond the bounds of their own organization to create something special, and to find the other connectors who will help them to do this.
This means that the leaders themselves need to have horizons beyond their own organizations, rather than concentrating on their purely local priorities – a quality that, I fear, is all too rare. However, Julia Middleton, of Common Purpose, in her recent book Beyond Authority has some nice examples of leaders who have done just that.
I am worried, too, by Karen Stephenson’s all-too-accurate comment that technology without trust is merely traffic. My worry, to use a modification of another of her neat observations, is that technology trumps trust: that just because we can communicate we believe we can collaborate.
After watching a violin quartet the other night, I asked one of the performers if they could play the same quartet virtually, if they were connected by some videoconferencing facility that linked them while being physically in different countries. She said that it might be technically possible but only if they had previously worked together and rehearsed in the same space. “The empathy and trust wouldn’t be there otherwise,” she said. Too true, I fear, and the same applies to any working group, be they playing violins or not.
The new heterarchies won’t work unless those hidden connectors can, in a sense, become the equivalent of that violin quartet, where leadership is so subtle as to be almost invisible; where empathy is the favored way of communicating; and where personal rivalry is subsumed in the cause of their joint creation. That won’t happen by e-mailing alone, just one more challenge thrown up by this new organizational form of heterarchy.
Karen Stephenson is right to have drawn our attention to it.
.
in 1
1 
Reader Comments (11)
Charles Handy is someone every thinker about organizations ought to be paying deep attention to: not just a casual read, but periodic return. As with Peter Drucker, Handy's ideas stand the test of time. In many ways, though, they go deeper: there is always a touch of the human as object/system part in Drucker that Handy almost always avoids.
In many ways our many technologies for communication work against us: building empathy and trust virtually is difficult in the virtual world. We do far more with and for people we have met, shared time and broken bread (or at least a coffee cup) with, have talked about a variety of things with that go beyond the work at hand.
My co-host on ZenBiz Radio, Allan Holender, likes to note that "you become the sum of the five people you spend the most time with". I am not going to quibble about whether the number is three, five, seven or fifteen, nor about exactly what is meant by "become the sum": it's a conversational statement, not the demonstratum of a proof. But I can assure you that the people I spend the most time with and who have made demonstrable changes in my way of being in the world over the past few years are not wired friends first. They may be on one or more social networks, but the bonds are forged — and renewed — through personal contact and long discussions.
We might well be on firmer ground, then, in thinking about organizations, to figure out how to "Goreify" (in the sense of William L. Gore and Associates) them. Small "villages" — ones that fit into the traditional Dunbar Number of 150 or less that you can know well enough to know as fully-embodied people — would do more to build the organizational equivalent of "quartets" that could flow together and be invisibly led than any amount of technology could. It would allow the breeding of leaders who are less infected with the meme of managerial perfectionism, order, and control. When Percy Barnevik became the head of the newly-merged ABB and slashed headquarters to less than 100 people, it was in part to turn the operating units into villages. This was highly successful, until it tripped over the fact that no one had copied the move in an operating unit. The "fix" of his successor — to undo the loose coupling and reassert control from the centre — has destroyed the ABB culture (and its success).
The positive contribution of the new technologies has been to make edginess in organizations — more interactions with the outside world — more likely and plausible: even those organizations that block these sites internally cannot stop employees from accessing them outside work hours and off the premises. That is slowly spreading a reforming soil into the organization. But little will really change, I think, until we find ways of rewarding leaders who lead by being first violin rather than Mr. Conductor — or a star soloist. That, in my view, will require a journey through the small to create enough safe-fail experiments because of the small scale of things to help shatter the preconceptions of the managerial/technological framework.
To know we're getting there from the outside? Wait to see if the company's ERP system is thrown in the bin, to be replaced by looser capabilities. That will be a lagging indicator that this cultural change is really taking hold.
I really enjoyed this article. I am always trying to foster replica Miss Sixty jewellery good relationships with people who can help my cause. This really breaks it down to a step by step process which is good
Beautiful Chaussures Nike is very cheep
cheap Air max is very Comfortable
Beautiful Nike Air max is very good
very good Nike Tn on sale
cheap Nike Shox is very cheep
our Chaussures Nike is very good
cheap Air max is Good quality
very good Nike Air max is very cheep
our Nike Tn is Good quality
Beautiful Nike Shox on sale
very good ralph lauren polo is very cheep
our polo ralph Lauren is Good quality
cheap ralph Lauren is very good
classic polo shirts is very Comfortable
Beautiful ralph lauren online on sale
cheap Ed Hardy is very good
very good Ed Hardy UK is very cheep
our Ed Hardy Clothing is Good quality
cheap Ed Hardy is very good
very good Ed Hardy UK is very cheep
our Ed Hardy Clothing is Good quality
Beautiful abercrombie on sale
good abercrombie and fitch is online shop
for sale abercrombie and fitch clothing good quality
boots abercrombie & fitch clothing is Good quality
classic abercrombie fitch is very Comfortable
very classic fitch clothing is very good
very cardy abercrombie and fitch sale is very Beautiful
very good abercrombie sale is very cheep
boots abercrombie clothing is Good quality
classic abercrombie and fitch uk is very Comfortable
very classic christian louboutin is very good
very cardy christian louboutin sale uk is very Beautiful
Beautiful discount louboutins on sale
good cheap louboutin store is online shop
for sale louboutin uk good quality
boots christian louboutin uk is Good quality
Beautiful abercrombie on sale
good abercrombie and fitch is online shop
for sale abercrombie and fitch clothing good quality
boots abercrombie & fitch clothing is Good quality
classic abercrombie fitch is very Comfortable
very classic fitch clothing is very good
very cardy abercrombie and fitch sale is very Beautiful
very good abercrombie sale is very cheep
boots abercrombie clothing is Good quality
classic abercrombie and fitch uk is very Comfortable
Beautiful chaussures nike is Good quality
good nike air max is very good
Beautiful air max is Good quality
classic nike tn is very Comfortable
very cardy nike shox is very cheep
boots UGG Boots UK is Good quality
classic ugg boots sale is very Comfortable
very classic cheap ugg boots is very good
very cardy ugg boots is very Beautiful
boots UGG Boots UK is Good quality
classic ugg boots sale is very Comfortable
very classic cheap ugg boots is very good
very cardy ugg boots is very Beautiful
Beautiful moncler jackets on sale
good moncler is online shop
for sale moncler coats good quality
nice chaussures nike is very Comfortable
cute nike air max nice
discount air max on sale
tall nike tn classic
prefect nike shox gift
That did not stop, including Banana Republic Air Jordan Retro 15 ; air jordan retro 15 black ; retro 15 laser and Martha (Marks and Spencer) and other brands Air Jordan Retro 11 ; Jordan Retro 11 ; air jordan 11 space jam including "the fashion industry high-end" Nike Air Jordan 2010 ; nike air jordan 2010 uk ; 2010 air jordans shoes (main street) to launch her own line of casual clothing efforts Air Jordan 19 retro; air jordan 19 xix black ; air jordan 19 shoes As a mark of the British fashion chain Air Jordan Retro 10 ; air jordan retro 10 for sale ; nike air jordan 10 x retro director Andy Reiss ? Rogers (Andy Rogers) said Air Jordan 6 Rings ; air jordan 6 rings aqua ; air jordan 6 rings concord Velvet is the fabric of the principal men of this winter sport jordan retro 5 ; jordan retro 5 black ; air jordan retro 5 white coat is a more extravagant style of the Garment Industry Jordan Flight 9 ; air jordan flight 9 black ; jordan flight 9 black white to go a historical movement Air Jordan Retro 6 ; air jordan retro 6 olympic ; air jordan retro 6 white red Listen to a charge of Air Jordan Retro 13 ; air jordan retro 13 low ; nike air jordan 13 financial services in London
http://www.fashionchristianlouboutinshoes.com/
Christian louboutin is the symbol of women.It is said that a woman without christian louboutin shoes knows nothing about fashion.That is right.If you want to be fashionable.Please buy christian louboutin shoes.A woman wearing christian louboutin sales can always be recognized easily from a group of people.
http://www.fashionchristianlouboutinshoes.com/products
but it’s alwaysair retro jordan
all retro jordan shoes
authentic retro jordan
authentic retro jordan shoes nice to fortify your
Retro Air Jordan 19
Retro Air Jordan 20
Retro Air Jordan 21rotation
and overallRetro Air Jordan 22
Retro Air Jordan 23
Retro Air Jordan 2009
collection with something as iconic like the Fire Red III,
buy nike shoes online
buy online nike shoes
buying nike shoes online
cheap nike shoes online
so if you don’tNike Retro Jordan
11Nike Retro Jordan 12
Nike Retro Jordan 13 have a
pair yet (or need a second to stock), entire the Sneaker News Air Jordan III ‘Fire Red’ Giveaway – all you need is a
Facebook account and a few moments of your time.Nike Retro Jordan 14
Nike Retro Jordan 15
Nike Retro Jordan 16 We’ve
got a number of sizes available.
Do you ever know about the funny vibrams five fingers and what do the vibram five fingerslooks like?Do you realize the making principle and function of vibram five finger shoes?Now I am very happy to talk about vibram five fingers sales with all of you because I just know somewhat about five fingers vibram.The rubber sole of vibram fivefinger shoes are quite soft.You may feel strange when you wear vibram five fingers sale first time.But you will feel very comfortable after you wear vibram fivefingers several time.Then you are supposed to know that vibram five fingers can protect our feet to a great degree.You can keep the right posture of you feet when you put on this interesting vibram five finger sale.With vibrams five finger,you can feel motion of you body sensitively.
From the Microsoft Office 2010 Word, the blogs can be used Microsoft Office 2007 in the right way, and Office 2010 use the pictures Office 2007 spelling checker to watch Office 2010 download your e-mail., you can do it Microsoft Office from Word to MS office 2007 lots of common office 2010 professional blogs which can be office 2010 beta used to that including Microsoft outlook 2010, MSN Spaces, Microsoft Office SharePoint Office 2007 key Server 2007 Bolger and so on when Microsoft outlook your blogs must be published microsoft office 2010 trial. Office Ultimate 2007 supply machines because help Outlook 2010 people create office 2010 product key and manage content Office 2007 download more useful and effectively than ever before Microsoft Office 2010 download. Use audible and text alerts that notify you download Office 2010 of specific because to monitor download Office 2007 people changes and gain microsoft office 2010 crack bigger visibility of the most u-to-date project Office 2010 key information in Office Groove office 2010 pro.
ホームページ製作
ホームページ制作
ホームページ作成
ホームページ作成ソフト
ホームページセミナー
CMS
ビジネスブログ
The post which with profound cultural leavel and rich social experience,it can be the classics of the irony,and we must admit that,this is just the degree where we are pursuing.!