« How Much Longer Before It Dawns on "Everybody" ? | Main | Unplugging ... A Serious Trend or a Plateau On the Way to More Sophisticated Useage ? »
Thursday
01Jan2009

Knowledge Workers As Itinerant Laborers ?

Here's a humorous look at a possible "future of work", thanks to links from Dave Snowden via Doc Searls.


While it seems absurd, a bit of reflection and extrapolation of current trends will, I think, allow most readers to nod bemusedly and say to themselves "Yes, I can see how this kind of thing is happening".


What do you think ?


.


Who's Available Today ?



Powered by Qumana


Reader Comments (3)

It is what the managers of businesses would like - keeps "talent" cheap.

I don't think it will be the future.

The future belongs to people who can detect business opportunity, form teams rapidly which means some institutionalization of work patterns, disband quickly which means assuming that people keep their eye on business opportunity and some notion protecting teams and their members.

Thank you. You've helped me write my organizational structure!

January 3, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterscotchcart

Yes ...

Clarify purpose, then develop focus, assemble necessary skills and competencies, execute, complete, then disband, move on ... use the infrastructure we call the Web and social computing tools and web services.

Call it what you will .. socio-technical systems, self-directed work teams, high-performance work teams, wirearchy .. it's increasingly the way work will be designed and carried out, in my opinion.

January 4, 2009 | Unregistered Commenteradmin

[...] zal je maar gebeuren. Dan moet je wat. Deze korte video impressie geeft aan hoe de rollen voor hoger opgeleiden op de arbeidsmarkt zo maar omgedraaid kunnen zijn. De [...]

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>